Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung RF510/RF410/RF710  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RF510/RF410/RF710
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '19 at 12:41
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45% Average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 110
48% 78 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 151
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Sanyo(144D C08E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Lighting 3.23
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 1.31
3% 3.28 fps
MRender 6.14
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.65
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 203 197 198 198 197 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.8% Above average
Read 231
Write 223
Mixed 222
SusWrite 200
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 25.2
76% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 180
136% 183 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 128%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
786GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 99 100 100 100 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 81.6
Write 101
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 97.5
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
172% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 70%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
14GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 81 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 140
Write 90.5
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 82
115% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 6.2
588% 8.13 MB/s
DQ Read 9.2
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 8.3
704% 9.63 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.4% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RF510/RF410/RF710 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $248
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback