Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710 (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG RF510/RF410/RF710
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110303
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '19 at 18:19
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Memory 65.3 1-Core 60.3 2-Core 111 48% 78.9 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 150 20% 151 Pts	64-Core 146 9% 146 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C08E) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.84% Terrible	Lighting 3.23 Reflection 5.08 Parallax 1.31 3% 3.21 fps	MRender 6.05 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 3.7 3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.84% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 202 196 197 197 196 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55% Above average	Read 231 Write 223 Mixed 220 SusWrite 199 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 34 4K Mixed 25.3 81% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 183 137% 183 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 128%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 786GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 97 100 100 100 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 54 Write 74.7 Mixed 46.3 SusWrite 97.7 50% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.5 171% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 70%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28 4,213 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 14GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 86 86 85 86 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	72% Very good	Read 156 Write 84.1 Mixed 56.1 SusWrite 85.7 116% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 6.2 560% 7.87 MB/s	DQ Read 9.3 DQ Write 12.1 DQ Mixed 8.5 735% 9.97 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 15,815 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.6% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 10.3 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RF510/RF410/RF710 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	30x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	26x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	55x
GeForce GT 420MNvidiaBench 2%, 1,922 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
Solid State Disk 120GBSpccBench 59%, 22,489 samples	2x
Extreme 240GBSanDisk $200Bench 76%, 7,034 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	15x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 80CE M471B5273CH0-CF8 6GBUnknownBench 28%, 29 samples	3x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $248

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16