Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 620 9,076 User benchmarks, average bench 42% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Memory 61.1 1-Core 68 2-Core 105 48% 78 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 157 21% 155 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M 9,073 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 215C) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.31% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 2.73 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.53 fps	MRender 3.38 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 2.04 2% 2.11 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.31% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 108 149 158 155 161 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.2% Average	Read 223 Write 221 Mixed 196 SusWrite 159 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 32.8 4K Mixed 19.4 67% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 133 111% 162 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 95%
Mass Storage Device 20GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 18GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 21 23 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	9.68% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 18.6 Mixed 14.7 SusWrite 20 25% 18.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.68% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 02FE EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 6GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1066, 1334 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.2% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 9.6 23% 8.03 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.67 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16