Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '19 at 18:14
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 94.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 198
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 489
56% 436 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Lighting 68.9
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 60.7
56% 66.3 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 71.3
58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 240GB-$110
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC01.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 296 301 300 307 302 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 470
Write 303
Mixed 326
SusWrite 297
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 30.9
107% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 177
172% 271 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 91%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
35GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 102 103 102 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 100
Write 102
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 102
63% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
910GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 174 173 175 175 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 142
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 173
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 112%
WD30PURX64P6ZY0 3TB
481GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 80 86 83 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 77
Write 62.7
Mixed 45
SusWrite 82.1
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 66%
SSK SHE088 500GB
42GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 40.3
Write 40.3
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 42.6
51% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 43%
SSK SHE088 500GB
14GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 59 50 50 65 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 60.5
Write 59.8
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 58.2
72% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Kingston 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.9% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.6
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 997 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback