HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive13.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15-db0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84AE
Memory18.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '19 at 12:53
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 54.8
2-Core 103
45% 73.6 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 262
28% 223 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84AE) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 19.3.3
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.8% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 11
Parallax 2.69
2% 5.32 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 3.83
Splatting 7.96
5% 5.36 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$74
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 107 104 103 94 94 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13.5% Very poor
Read 132
Write 99
Mixed 102
SusWrite 99.3
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 2.4
7% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 308%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB
1TB free, PID 25fa
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 102 80 99 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 109
Write 103
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 97.7
127% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.8
272% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD BLS16G4S240FSD.16FBD 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.7% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 25.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-db0xxx Builds (Compare 1,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback