Alienware Aurora R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora R5  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 01NYPT
Memory40.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 11 '19 at 13:50
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 120
2-Core 250
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 704
69% 565 Pts
64-Core 716
44% 716 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.70
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 203
Reflection 219
Parallax 236
165% 219 fps
MRender 250
Gravity 199
Splatting 131
151% 193 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 149%
Great: 174%
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.70
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 144
Parallax 134
107% 136 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 130
Splatting 106
94% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57DA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,048
Write 694
Mixed 696
180% 812 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 39.1
128% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 836
DQ Write 675
DQ Mixed 610
496% 707 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 207%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
316GB free
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 406 397 415 420 375 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 397
Write 379
Mixed 306
SusWrite 398
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 33.7
113% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 246
208% 302 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 125%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
565GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 434 417 435 438 447 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 422
Mixed 300
SusWrite 428
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 32
97% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 133%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
493GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 79 76 75 75 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 86.5
Write 88.7
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 74.6
102% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4DFD8213.C16FDD Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1315 CT16G4DFD8213.C16FDD Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.5% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.4
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 21.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora R5 Builds (Compare 1,735 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $312
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback