Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '19 at 04:09
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 221
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 740
70% 580 Pts
64-Core 1145
71% 1145 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
PowerColor(148C 2337) 2GB
CLim: 955 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.7.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 40.2
0% 22.8 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 35.8
26% 31.1 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 8.85%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 251GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 396 246 406 162 274 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 707
Write 710
Mixed 423
SusWrite 294
119% 534 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 19.8
81% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 96.1
94% 149 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 95%
Amd-raid ST1000DM010-2EP1 1TB
305GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 116 93 121 86 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 183
Write 87.7
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 103
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W641GU42J9266N3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 30
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,671 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $653
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback