Lenovo 4291QQ1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 4291QQ1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4291QQ1
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '16 at 21:07
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2620M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 136
64% 102 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 196
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21DA) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3347
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 2.81
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 2.71
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.35
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SFAT128G1122 128GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2333000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.1% Below average
Read 261
Write 178
Mixed 157
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 3.79
47% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 22.9
DQ Mixed 16.3
24% 46.6 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HTS543216A7A384 160GB
132GB free
Firmware: ES1ZB70B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 84.3
Write 85
Mixed 16.2
45% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.31
76% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-073.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
29.5% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback