Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '19 at 15:21
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 197
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 490
55% 429 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (71 fps cap detected)
57.4% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 61.3
57% 67.6 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 70.9
58% 70.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 240GB-$110
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC01.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 299 300 301 305 305 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 482
Write 302
Mixed 325
SusWrite 301
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 31.8
111% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 177
170% 266 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 91%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
23GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 61 60 61 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 58.7
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 60.8
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
931GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 175 174 173 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 134
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 174
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 112%
WD30PURX64P6ZY0 3TB
467GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 76 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 76
Write 72.3
Mixed 55
SusWrite 75.8
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Kingston 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.6% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback