Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181004
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateAug 07 '19 at 16:37
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 76.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 912
84% 702 Pts
64-Core 2,606
161% 2,606 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 257 254 252 252 247 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 485
Mixed 380
SusWrite 269
91% 408 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 52.8
176% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 363
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
290GB free
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1315 1497 1498 1496 1497 1496 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,516
Write 1,503
Mixed 880
SusWrite 1,466
302% 1,341 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 59
207% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 938
DQ Write 429
DQ Mixed 625
479% 664 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 244%
Great: 295%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
330GB free
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 482 482 482 482 482 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 156
Mixed 212
SusWrite 470
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 51.4
173% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 183
158% 240 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 115%
Great: 126%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 124 127 119 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 118
Write 119
Mixed 62
SusWrite 123
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.4
243% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 99%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 186 191 186 181 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 194
Mixed 113
SusWrite 186
125% 170 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.9
276% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
2.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 135 124 136 131 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 139
Write 125
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 131
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
201% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FADG 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.6% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 24.6
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback