TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus CG8250

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CG8250  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8250
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '19 at 16:27
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 164
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 298
38% 287 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 68.9%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
Sapphire(174B E308)
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
40.4% Average
Lighting 51.4
Reflection 52.1
Parallax 60.7
42% 54.7 fps
MRender 52.4
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 38.1
37% 46.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 40.4%
 Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 9 95 27 17 34 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.7% Poor
Read 176
Write 154
Mixed 140
SusWrite 49.4
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 3.7
52% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 0.9
2% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 24.7%
 Great: 87%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
393GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 99 102 102 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 78.5
Write 109
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 102
62% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 51.9%
 Great: 71%
WDC WD25 00BEKT-60PVMT0 250GB
35GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 23 23 23 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 23.5
Write 20.3
Mixed 20
SusWrite 22.3
29% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 14.6%
 Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G Adata EL63I1C1624ZV CT102464BD160B.C16 99U5584-003.A00LF 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 49.8%
 Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CG8250 Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CG8250

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel  $137Bench 67%, 185,630 samples86x
Core i5-2320Intel  $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples18x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples14x
GPU
GTX 550-TiNvidia  $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples18x
GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples16x
GTX 760Nvidia  $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples7x
SSD
Blue 250GBWD  $77Bench 79%, 26,761 samples9x
BX500 240GBCrucial  $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples6x
RAM
EL63I1C1624ZV 2x4GBAdataBench 48%, 365 samples9x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 51%, 10,062 samples5x
EL63I1C1624ZV EL63I1C1624ZV 16GBAdataBench 48%, 10 samples4x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback