Lenovo 0568A42

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemLenovo 0568A42  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '16 at 11:32
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 196
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 498
56% 442 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285
EVGA(3842 1285) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4196
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 9.85
Parallax 6
11% 9.73 fps
MRender 9.95
Gravity 10.9
Splatting 11.1
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 256GB-$100
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231600 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 415
Write 400
Mixed 305
83% 373 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 21.9
84% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 49.4
82% 159 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 100%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 04.01G02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 95.7
Mixed 97.9
74% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.38
123% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 63%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 116
Write 107
Mixed 106
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.15
74% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 67%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$80
331GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 96.1
Mixed 88.6
71% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.54
132% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
295GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 102
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.38
104% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325R7CFR8A HMT325R7CFR8A HMT325R7CFR8A HMT325R7CFR8A Samsung M393B5773CH0- Samsung M393B5773CH0- Samsung M393B5773CH0- Samsung M393B5773CH0- 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 30.1
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback