Acer Predator G9-592

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	40.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer Predator G9-592 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Mustang_SLS
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181002
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '19 at 03:36
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 65.2 2-Core 133 57% 93.1 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 487 47% 388 Pts	64-Core 519 32% 519 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) 213,495 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 107E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	5.57% Terrible	Lighting 5.63 Reflection 8.35 Parallax 6.12 5% 6.7 fps	MRender 7.29 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 12.9 8% 8.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.57% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 980M 14,160 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Acer(1025 107E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.8% Average	Lighting 48 Reflection 48.3 Parallax 43.7 39% 46.7 fps	MRender 59.3 Gravity 51.6 Splatting 52 44% 54.3 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$105 6,748 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 526GB free Firmware: X41110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 395 365 311 304 304 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Read 428 Write 401 Mixed 321 SusWrite 346 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 31.5 105% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 240 203% 297 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 108%
SABRENT 1TB 764GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1593 1082 948 901 947 960 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB 55,289 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	69.7% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 22.4 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 20.9 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G9-592 Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G9-592

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	40x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	12x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	21x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	20x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	9x

SSD
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples	8x
MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 3,145 samples	6x
860 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 89%, 201,200 samples	3x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	25x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples	9x
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 70%, 4,393 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16