Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '19 at 00:17
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 82.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 859
78% 656 Pts
64-Core 1,219
76% 1,219 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
ASRock(1849 5001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 74.6
Parallax 86.2
54% 75.5 fps
MRender 73.8
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 60.4
54% 67 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0B 2TB
624GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 450 457 443 438 482 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 481
Mixed 339
SusWrite 453
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 45.7
159% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 249
212% 312 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 112%
Great: 119%
Adata SU655 120GB
5GB free
Firmware: V8X01c45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 423
Write 370
Mixed 341
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 34.1
122% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 184
141% 188 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 94%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
698GB free
Firmware: AX0A4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 102 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 101
Write 99.5
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 102
61% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 57%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$30
931GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 81 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 76.7
Write 81.5
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 82.2
52% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 34.1
110% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 29.2
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 106%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $511
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback