Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '19 at 21:02
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 76.8
1-Core 115
2-Core 227
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 874
79% 667 Pts
64-Core 1,260
78% 1,260 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
ASRock(1849 5001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Lighting 68
Reflection 71
Parallax 85.8
55% 74.9 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 68.7
Splatting 58.1
53% 66 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0B 2TB
621GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 455 462 472 481 481 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 480
Mixed 361
SusWrite 471
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 46.4
160% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 253
218% 322 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 113%
Great: 119%
Adata SU655 120GB
5GB free
Firmware: V8X01c45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 435
Write 363
Mixed 344
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 34.2
122% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 185
141% 186 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 94%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
698GB free
Firmware: AX0A4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 102 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 99.7
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 103
61% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 57%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$30
931GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 82 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 77
Write 65.2
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 82.3
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 28.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 24.8
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $511
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback