Asus WS C246 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus WS C246 PRO  (all builds)
Memory60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '19 at 23:23
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2278G
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 147
2-Core 275
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 1,113
98% 834 Pts
64-Core 1,575
98% 1,575 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 8782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.43% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 12
Parallax 8.5
6% 9.15 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 7.57
Splatting 16.9
11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.43%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500M8120G 120GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 76 62 62 84 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 439
Write 318
Mixed 298
SusWrite 81.3
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 41.1
152% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 99.9
100% 166 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 83%
Avago MR9440-8i 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 5.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1562 1578 1581 1574 1563 1583 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965669-032.A00G 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 26.7
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS C246 PRO Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus WS C246 PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $555
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback