Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 03 '19 at 22:25
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 445
60% 446 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.5% Above average
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 68
Parallax 82.2
54% 72.2 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 68.7
Splatting 57.7
52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 35 70 21 21 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 505
Write 444
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 98.9
59% 269 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 18.5
78% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 29.6
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 46.5
77% 138 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58%
Great: 100%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
127GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 434 433 437 438 437 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 431
Mixed 431
SusWrite 430
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 30.5
133% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 40.3
79% 155 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD2 BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 29.2
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 25.4
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $511
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback