Asus N53SM

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Asus N53SM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N53SM
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111103
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '16 at 20:21
Run Duration	91 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 77.8 2-Core 149 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 359 39% 310 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M 7,774 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 2114) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5384 Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	3.26% Terrible	Lighting 3.87 Reflection 4.65 Parallax 1.78 3% 3.43 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 4.37 Splatting 3 4% 4.46 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.26% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 18 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 28 (A3) Unknown 100 100 324 (94) Unknown 100 100 4359 (95) Unknown 100 100 88 (96) Unknown 100 100 0 (97) Unknown 100 100 64 (A4) Unknown 100 100 1545 (A5) Unknown 100 100 11 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 48576821264419 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6153 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5472 (F5) Unknown 100 100 9125 (F6) Unknown 100 100 8718 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	60.1% Good	Read 480 Write 256 Mixed 266 74% 334 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 34.9 4K Mixed 16.1 63% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 74.2 DQ Mixed 30.8 51% 102 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMSO4GX3M1A1333C9 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 029E CMSO4GX3M1A1333C9 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	47% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 15 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15.4 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N53SM Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N53SM

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	94x
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	20x
Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples	2x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	61x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	44x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	13x

SSD
SP800 64GBAdataBench 40%, 122 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $78Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	4x

RAM
HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 6GBHynixBench 38%, 426 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	14x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 6GBHynixBench 40%, 239 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $200

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16