Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '19 at 07:37
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 65.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 195
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 385
54% 400 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.3
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Lighting 71.8
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 89.5
58% 77 fps
MRender 70.6
Gravity 73
Splatting 59.8
55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02000004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 35 4 65 33 1.9 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23% Poor
Read 34.8
Write 130
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 53.6
13% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 22.7
39% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 60.1
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 185
116% 128 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 23%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
225GB free
Firmware: 4.ADA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 64 58 84 65 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 93.8
Write 57
Mixed 49
SusWrite 63.7
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 54%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 165 165 164 164 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 156
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 163
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 100%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
29GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 6.2 7 8.9 9.2 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
7.13% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 0.8
Mixed 9
SusWrite 7.6
10% 9.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.13%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
8;94 D4H8GL32A8TX 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.7% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 26.3
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 22.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $231
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback