Sony VPCCA3S1E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSony VPCCA3S1E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '19 at 19:10
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 99.4
49% 75.3 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 147
20% 146 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6400M Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)
Sony(104D 9081) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
2.35% Terrible
Lighting 3.17
Reflection 3.35
Parallax 2.53
3% 3.01 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.26 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.35%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7 500GB
447GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AC90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 78 67 53 58 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
36% Below average
Read 58.3
Write 81
Mixed 30
SusWrite 67.2
43% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.3
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCCA3S1E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCCA3S1E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback