Packard EasyNote TX86

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemPackard EasyNote TX86  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJM50_CP
Memory1.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110428
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateAug 02 '19 at 18:10
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium P6100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 50.6
2-Core 99.6
44% 71.3 Pts
4-Core 98.1
8-Core 98.5
13% 98.3 Pts
64-Core 98.6
6% 98.6 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M
Acer(1025 041E) 512MB
Driver: Ver. 21.21.13.4201
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.32% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.81
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.55 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.17
2% 2.25 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.32%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 20 21 23 21 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 49
Write 43.4
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 21.3
28% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 47%
SD Card 2GB
1GB free, PID null, Transcend 2gb MicroSD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 6 6.2 6.4 6 6.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
4.47% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 6.2
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 6
9% 7.85 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.47%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG 80CE M471B2873FHS-CH9 3GB
1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 8.9
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TX86 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TX86

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback