Asus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime8 Days
Run DateAug 02 '19 at 03:34
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 87.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 241
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 674
68% 553 Pts
64-Core 702
43% 702 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.5% Very good
Lighting 103
Reflection 109
Parallax 108
84% 107 fps
MRender 91.6
Gravity 84.5
Splatting 84.5
71% 86.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 1TB-$310
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 292 190 238 243 270 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 474
Write 442
Mixed 257
SusWrite 259
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 32.7
111% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 216
188% 281 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 106%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
593GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 448 431 400 396 400 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 464
Mixed 394
SusWrite 419
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 51.3
170% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 261
223% 327 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 114%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 159 156 159 158 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 150
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 158
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
8TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 137 135 139 140 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 134
Write 116
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 138
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 97%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 98 96 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 178
Write 144
Mixed 85
SusWrite 95.9
160% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
68% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 67%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 75 75 74 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 187
Write 146
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 74.5
154% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 72%
LaCie CooKey 32GB
21GB free, PID 103b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4 2.5 9.1 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 10
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 7.5
12% 9.62 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
11% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2666 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.9% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 25.7
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 24.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback