Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5630 579 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 43.9 1-Core 42.8 2-Core 80.6 34% 55.8 Pts	4-Core 165 8-Core 228 25% 197 Pts	64-Core 238 15% 238 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 69%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 360GB 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6.64 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 270 260 267 264 263 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Generic- SD/MMC 32GB 180 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 29GB free, PID 1220 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 11 11 11 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	7.15% Terrible	Read 24 Write 8.7 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 10.2 14% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 30% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.15% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16x16GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 16 of 18 slots used 256GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	26.8% Poor	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 10.5 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.2 12% 4.23 GB/s	Latency 185 22% 185 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 133%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56601stBench 66%, 2,343 samples	4x
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon X55501stBench 66%, 1,356 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 24%, 8,041 samples	2x
Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples	1x
GeForce 9600 GSONvidiaBench 5%, 1,167 samples	1x

SSD
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	2x
LOGICAL VOLUME 525GBHPBench 66%, 2 samples	1x
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16