HP ProLiant DL380 G7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProLiant DL380 G7  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory121.2 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '19 at 15:00
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5630
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 31.1
2-Core 58.7
35% 51.5 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 354
32% 272 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 360GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 264 269 262 264 261 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.3% Very good
Read 517
Write 265
Mixed 544
SusWrite 273
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 25.2
87% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 215
157% 208 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 54%
Generic- SD/MMC 32GB
29GB free, PID 1220
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 9.2 11 11 9.7 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
7.27% Terrible
Read 23.2
Write 2.5
Mixed 5
SusWrite 9.8
11% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
28% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.27%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16x16GB
16 of 18 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant DL380 G7 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP ProLiant DL380 G7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback