Asus P5Q DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5Q DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '16 at 21:10
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 46.1
1-Core 34.1
2-Core 68.5
31% 49.6 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 130
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3001) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.8% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 55.8
36% 43.8 fps
MRender 30.2
Gravity 48.7
Splatting 39.1
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.6% Below average
Read 259
Write 81
Mixed 161
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 2.14
48% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 99.7
DQ Mixed 1.87
33% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST3200822A 200GB
186GB free
Firmware: 3.01 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 30.4
Mixed 21.3
20% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.38
90% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.6
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q DELUXE Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $459
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback