Asrock X99 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '19 at 18:18
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 274
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 910
85% 709 Pts
64-Core 1,074
66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Zotac(19DA 3426) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 148
Parallax 128
120% 141 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 138
Splatting 110
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 952 667 670 667 668 667 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,430
Write 2,000
Mixed 1,385
SusWrite 715
364% 1,632 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 84.3
290% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,097
DQ Write 946
DQ Mixed 1,022
766% 1,022 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 276%
Great: 340%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
628GB free
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1216 877 852 948 894 395 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
816% Outstanding
Read 5,586
Write 5,086
Mixed 5,181
SusWrite 864
935% 4179 MB/s
4K Read 494
4K Write 453
4K Mixed 463
1,581% 470 MB/s
DQ Read 1,148
DQ Write 1,038
DQ Mixed 1,118
832% 1,101 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 816%
Great: 295%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
107GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 323 323 324 324 323 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 473
Write 320
Mixed 293
SusWrite 323
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 24
97% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 83.8
DQ Mixed 131
112% 170 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 110%
Samsung 850 EVO 250G 181GB
123GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 295 297 296 296 296 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 529
Write 459
Mixed 372
SusWrite 314
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 47.6
170% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 254
200% 274 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
WD Purple Surveillance 6TB (2017)-$140
5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 160 163 163 163 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 148
Write 152
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 162
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZSK F4-3200C16-8GTZSW F4-3200C16-8GTZSW F4-3200C16-8GTZSK 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
122% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 57.5
MC Mixed 40.6
135% 47.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 22.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 53.4
75% 53.4 ns
Poor: 120%
This bench: 122%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Taichi Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $438
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback