Asus B150 PRO GAMING D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B150 PRO GAMING D3  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '19 at 08:14
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 225
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 642
67% 536 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.3% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 138
Parallax 129
101% 130 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 123
Splatting 103
91% 112 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 962 864 866 864 827 719 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,207
Write 1,059
Mixed 990
SusWrite 850
231% 1,026 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 89.3
293% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,187
DQ Write 1,054
DQ Mixed 1,116
838% 1,119 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 241%
Great: 355%
M4-CT128M4SSD2 240GB
24GB free
Firmware: SAFC12.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 474
Write 448
Mixed 367
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 40.7
151% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 201
186% 286 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$98
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 146 143 146 143 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 160
Write 144
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 144
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
211GB free
Firmware: MN6OAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 89 89 89 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 153
Write 153
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 88.9
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 85%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 113 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 118
Write 109
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 112
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 83%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$166
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 220 217 221 221 220 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 1866 C8 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.5% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 21.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 22.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150 PRO GAMING D3 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus B150 PRO GAMING D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback