MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A20
MotherboardMSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)  (all builds)
Memory74 GB free of 80 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160914
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 29 '19 at 21:27
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 239
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 726
74% 600 Pts
64-Core 934
58% 934 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 152
Parallax 142
120% 147 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 142
Splatting 111
100% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 212 204 217 210 220 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 299
Mixed 310
SusWrite 206
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 41.5
163% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 249
214% 316 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 128%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
63GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,250
Write 4,206
Mixed 3,861
917% 4,106 MB/s
4K Read 495
4K Write 286
4K Mixed 348
1,347% 376 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 815
DQ Mixed 879
673% 918 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
72GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 161 160 163 157 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 450
Mixed 411
SusWrite 155
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 60.9
204% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 352
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
374GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 152 151 156 150 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 128
Mixed 101
SusWrite 147
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 108%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 121 120 125 118 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 154
Write 130
Mixed 117
SusWrite 120
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
207GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 92 96 91 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 89.2
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 92.8
59% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 59%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500G 500GB
219GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 290 286 299 286 298 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 472
Mixed 449
SusWrite 281
560% 417 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 43.5
3,859% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 36.9
DQ Write 85
DQ Mixed 50
4,729% 57.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 340%
Great: 376%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250G 250GB
217GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 287 283 295 283 295 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 438
Mixed 399
SusWrite 278
531% 403 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 44.7
3,884% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 39.6
DQ Write 85.1
DQ Mixed 51.6
4,796% 58.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 343%
Great: 338%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 80GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
119% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 54.8
MC Mixed 43.1
134% 46.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 20
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) Builds (Compare 795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) - $223

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback