Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160314
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '19 at 10:19
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$68 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Memory 59.3 1-Core 89.4 2-Core 193 62% 114 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 297 27% 227 Pts	64-Core 296 18% 296 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.6% Below average	Lighting 39.8 Reflection 29.8 Parallax 35.4 32% 35 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 34.6 30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84 21,990 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 338 Write 337 Mixed 296 72% 324 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 8.3 15% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 102GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 104 105 106 105 105 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 120 Write 115 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 102 73% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 112%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 8GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.9 5.1 5 5 4.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.23% Terrible	Read 20.2 Write 0.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 4.7 7% 7.48 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.23% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-044.A00G 1x8GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 8.9 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 9.7 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B150M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 2,398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H - $95

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	686x
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	438x
Core i5-6400Intel $68Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	296x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	290x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	176x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	175x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	63x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	56x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $371

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16