| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus P5P43TD (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100622 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 28 '19 at 08:36 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5470
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
|
60.4%
Good
|
54% 87.2 Pts
|
31% 232 Pts
|
15% 236 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2297 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48%
Average
|
40% 68.8 fps
|
64% 78.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 199 41 150 144 142 MB/s
|
38.6%
Below average
|
41% 184 MB/s
|
64% 19.7 MB/s
|
16% 22.3 MB/s
|
|
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
124GB free
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 69 70 69 69 MB/s
|
40%
Below average
|
47% 64.4 MB/s
|
134% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.3%
Poor
|
26% 9.13 GB/s
|
23% 8.17 GB/s
|
51% 78.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5P43TD Builds (Compare 120 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5P43TD
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 19x |
| Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples | 9x |
| Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 6x |
| GeForce GTS 250NvidiaBench 7%, 14,881 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $290 |