Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '19 at 17:58
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User LCA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 172
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 603
55% 461 Pts
64-Core 850
53% 850 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 73%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.3% Very good
Lighting 98.6
Reflection 92
Parallax 85
80% 91.9 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 86.1
Splatting 75.6
71% 88.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
821GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 416 467 469 467 470 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 463
Mixed 373
SusWrite 456
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 46.5
161% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 220
185% 269 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 110%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2666 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 21.7
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 20.8
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP-CF Builds (Compare 395 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback