Asus F2A55-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F2A55-M  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '19 at 00:57
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 39.7
2-Core 74.6
44% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 105
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570D
Asus(1043 8526) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 7.88
Parallax 5.06
4% 6.15 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 7.22
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 06.01D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 52 63 69 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 80
Write 65.8
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 61.6
48% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 EWB4GB681CA3-16IC Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30% Poor
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 10
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A55-M Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $161
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback