Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	91.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus Z10PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory	53.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180413
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '19 at 15:22
Run Duration	300 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel 0000 41 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 79.5 1-Core 97.6 2-Core 194 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 702 65% 543 Pts	64-Core 1,979 122% 1,979 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2156 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 123 Parallax 104 93% 113 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 108 Splatting 110 89% 108 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$197 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 468GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1291 1147 1125 1118 497 550 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	207% Outstanding	Read 1,759 Write 1,183 Mixed 752 SusWrite 955 259% 1,162 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 92 4K Mixed 50.6 168% 59.5 MB/s	DQ Read 776 DQ Write 374 DQ Mixed 541 411% 564 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 207% Great: 302%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$175 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 963GB free Firmware: R021 SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 392 389 385 382 370 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 294 Write 379 Mixed 246 SusWrite 384 74% 326 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 74.3 4K Mixed 25 101% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 339 234% 286 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 105%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 107GB free Firmware: DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 278 277 277 278 278 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 458 Write 439 Mixed 400 SusWrite 286 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 74.4 4K Mixed 47.5 162% 54.2 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 232 208% 315 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 118%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 23TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 452 440 475 468 459 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 483 Write 456 Mixed 111 SusWrite 459 84% 377 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 1.4 36% 10.1 MB/s	DQ Read 76.1 DQ Write 14.9 DQ Mixed 6.1 15% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 183%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 170GB free Firmware: A3U0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 107 110 107 108 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 96.3 Write 88 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 108 58% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 75%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB 1,326 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 5.5TB free Firmware: W7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 212 213 198 214 218 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 153 Write 163 Mixed 75 SusWrite 211 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 121%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB 1,326 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 140GB free Firmware: APGNW7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 201 205 219 192 208 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 180 Mixed 74 SusWrite 205 116% 159 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 121%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 5TB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 189 193 196 194 193 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 109%
H/W RAID 0 (Spanning) 24TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 121 121 121 122 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 124 Write 119 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 121 144% 108 MB/s	4K Read 8.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 158% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 4x16GB 577 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.5% Very good	MC Read 36.3 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 28 87% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 15.7 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 102%

UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	19x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GBIntel $550Bench 186%, 8,641 samples	11x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $159Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	10x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	21x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 8x8GBMicronBench 92%, 150 samples	12x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $658

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336