Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '19 at 12:54
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 492
56% 437 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 67.2
56% 68.2 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 70
57% 69.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 240GB-$110
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC01.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 295 300 303 301 297 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 367
Write 300
Mixed 254
SusWrite 298
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 28.9
100% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 37.4
37% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 91%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
24GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 62 62 61 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 81.4
Write 78.4
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 61.2
47% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 61%
WD30PURX64P6ZY0 3TB
481GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 77 77 78 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 71.3
Write 72
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 76.5
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 66%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
12GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 7.2 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
8.02% Terrible
Read 32.7
Write 12.7
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 7.9
16% 15 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
23% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.02%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Kingston 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.2% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback