TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus G20BM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G20BM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G20BM
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '19 at 05:59
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-770K (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 131
55% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 227
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 54.3%
 Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
Asus(1043 8651) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Lighting 37.2
Reflection 33
Parallax 44.1
30% 38.1 fps
MRender 30.2
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 39.6
29% 34.2 fps
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 29.7%
 Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 194 198 194 193 195 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 336
Write 296
Mixed 294
SusWrite 193
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 33.8
121% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 160
131% 186 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 71.5%
 Great: 91%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
924GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 130 136 137 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 126
Write 121
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 133
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 74.2%
 Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.2% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 25.2%
 Great: 67%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical G20BM Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G20BM

CPU
FX-770K (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 1,664 samples24x
A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 41%, 15,719 samples6x
GPU
Radeon R9 255AMDBench 8%, 591 samples5x
R9 270AMD  $140Bench 24%, 47,409 samples5x
Radeon R9 370AMDBench 25%, 513 samples3x
SSD
TS512GMTS430S 512GBTranscendBench 85%, 550 samples2x
RBU-SC1 128GBKingstonBench 45%, 41 samples2x
SU750 256GBAdataBench 82%, 3,130 samples2x
RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples7x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples2x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 18,159 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback