Samsung 530U3C/530U4C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 530U3C/530U4C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '19 at 17:55
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 102
53% 82 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 144
19% 145 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D7) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 2.66
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 7.39
4% 4.84 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 4%
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Gigabyte(1458 3552) 2GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Lighting 34.9
Reflection 34.3
Parallax 49.5
28% 39.5 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 30.6
31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 3.1 8 4.2 4.7 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 419
Write 339
Mixed 222
SusWrite 49.6
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 8.8
45% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 87.3
DQ Mixed 27.2
41% 78 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 56%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$62
110GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 109 110 110 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 110
73% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Kingston 99U4342-018.A00G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 17.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 530U3C/530U4C Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3C/530U4C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback