HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory27 GB free of 96.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '19 at 12:09
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 174
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 596
58% 479 Pts
64-Core 1,341
83% 1,341 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 33.4
32% 34 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 36.7
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
41GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,475
Write 1,268
Mixed 1,054
281% 1,266 MB/s
4K Read 63.7
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 80.8
278% 97.3 MB/s
DQ Read 975
DQ Write 1,050
DQ Mixed 1011
761% 1,012 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
871GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1259 1256 1259 1204 1149 1162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1,499
Write 1,268
Mixed 1,237
SusWrite 1,215
293% 1,305 MB/s
4K Read 64.5
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 84.8
294% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,400
DQ Write 1,063
DQ Mixed 1,131
873% 1,198 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 280%
Great: 372%
RAID1 1.5TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 390 390 390 390 390 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 437
Mixed 440
SusWrite 391
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 38.2
122% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 351
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 112%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
2TB free
Firmware: 1AQ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 127 127 127 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 138
Write 43.4
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 126
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 76%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 2C 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 2C... 130GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 20.4
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback