Asrock B360M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B360M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory53 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190507
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 24 '19 at 22:01
Run Duration357 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 239
90% 157 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 896
88% 719 Pts
64-Core 1,123
70% 1,123 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.9% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 137
Parallax 119
101% 127 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 128
Splatting 103
92% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,378
Write 2255
Mixed 1,536
457% 2,056 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 83.7
277% 94.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,006
DQ Write 1,200
DQ Mixed 1,171
864% 1,126 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199
437GB free
Firmware: X21100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 484 485 486 481 481 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 464
Mixed 296
SusWrite 482
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 39
135% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 159
162% 265 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199
225GB free
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 476 477 476 473 472 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 500
Write 462
Mixed 275
SusWrite 475
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 25.8
112% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 84.2
DQ Mixed 81.8
73% 114 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 114%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
170GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 487 487 486 482 482 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 474
Mixed 410
SusWrite 485
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 55.9
180% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 329
248% 332 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 121%
Great: 134%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 250GB
357GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 700 701 701 699 694 691 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 806
Write 697
Mixed 710
SusWrite 698
164% 728 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 81.8
273% 96.7 MB/s
DQ Read 832
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 1,146
757% 898 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 194%
Great: 392%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$175
684GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 463 463 457 377 377 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 465
Mixed 383
SusWrite 432
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 35.5
122% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 309
232% 312 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 105%
SD Card 128GB
74GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 103 103 103 95 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 141
Write 75.7
Mixed 23
SusWrite 87.5
98% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.8
104% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 43%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
145GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 164 163 164 164 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 166
Write 168
Mixed 134
SusWrite 163
214% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 25.5
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 27.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B360M Pro4 - $21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $378
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback