Gigabyte GA-Sabre 17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Sabre 17  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170802
Uptime11.8 Days
Run DateJul 24 '19 at 02:03
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 86.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 226
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 554
61% 483 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Lighting 4.97
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 4.91
4% 13.2 fps
MRender 7.48
Gravity 4.43
Splatting 9.65
6% 7.19 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1104 1112 1119 1147 1094 1089 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,894
Write 945
Mixed 744
SusWrite 1,110
260% 1,173 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 57.5
230% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,089
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 494
419% 634 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 245%
Great: 243%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
878GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 123 123 121 122 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 128
Write 99.2
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 120
68% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TN48G24S817-VHA/R Transcend JM2400HSB-8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 21.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Sabre 17 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Sabre 17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback