bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '16 at 21:05
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU socket #0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
60% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 187
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 249
32% 240 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60%
Great: 72%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 160MB
Driver: vm3dum64.dll Ver. 8.15.1.33
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.11% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.23
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.11%
Great: 69%
Nvidia Quadro 5000
HP(103C 0770) 2.5GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4788
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 20.4
Parallax 14.6
11% 16.1 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 17.2
14% 17 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 86GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.2% Below average
Read 229
Write 189
Mixed 192
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 9.76
4K Mixed 6.17
39% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 49.5
DQ Write 9.56
DQ Mixed 6.28
11% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 64 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
78.3% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 27
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 80.9
50% 80.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback