ADD TO PC
BUILD

Novatech PC-X009670

Performance Results


Gaming 133% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 136% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	273% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Novatech PC-X009670 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181204
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '19 at 23:27
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 94.2 1-Core 152 2-Core 301 100% 183 Pts	4-Core 601 8-Core 1,140 104% 871 Pts	64-Core 1,633 101% 1,633 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 1E87) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 174 Reflection 166 Parallax 176 142% 172 fps	MRender 190 Gravity 154 Splatting 114 120% 152 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$142 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 677GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 819 725 579 548 497 615 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	273% Outstanding	Read 2,442 Write 2,111 Mixed 1,498 SusWrite 630 372% 1,670 MB/s	4K Read 57.9 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 79 262% 91.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,399 DQ Write 1,091 DQ Mixed 1210 915% 1,233 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 273% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 92GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 475 473 477 470 482 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 478 Mixed 392 SusWrite 476 104% 462 MB/s	4K Read 45 4K Write 90.5 4K Mixed 57.6 190% 64.4 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 353 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 134%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013) 72,354 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 457GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 33 32 32 32 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 114 Write 31.7 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 32.4 40% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 79% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 217 219 219 219 219 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Read 110 Write 131 Mixed 74 SusWrite 218 97% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 106%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400 2.5" 320GB-$35 9,368 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 186GB free Firmware: 0003DEM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 49 50 49 49 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 50%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 7GB free, PID ce17 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 35.1 Write 38.5 Mixed 30 SusWrite 39.5 49% 35.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 029E CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	86.1% Excellent	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 25.3 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 37.9 SC Mixed 27 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 59.2 68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback