Asrock ZH77 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock ZH77 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '19 at 15:50
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 213
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 513
56% 441 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)
Asus(1043 8406) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
45.6% Average
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 35.3
Parallax 43.8
52% 47.8 fps
MRender 48.4
Gravity 39
Splatting 33.3
32% 40.2 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 282 277 266 261 257 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 486
Write 461
Mixed 388
SusWrite 273
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 30.2
109% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 238
206% 307 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 142 148 147 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 86.4
Write 81.9
Mixed 11
SusWrite 146
58% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
347GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 156 172 173 171 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 119
Write 120
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 168
77% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 859B RM51264BA1339.16FM 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 859B RM51264BA1339.16FM 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.5% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZH77 Pro3 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock ZH77 Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $455
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback