Asus P8Z77-V LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LE  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131210
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateOct 14 '16 at 16:48
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470T-$130
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 96
2-Core 176
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 230
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Sapphire(174B E244) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 22
14% 18.6 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 18.5
14% 16.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 135
Write 134
Mixed 125
99% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 0.25
98% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 85%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
458GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 96.4
Write 93.4
Mixed 91.1
70% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.2
88% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
436GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 103
Write 97.9
Mixed 98
75% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.23
85% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 86%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
152GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 117
81% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.2
84% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
43GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 94.7
Write 116
Mixed 90.1
75% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.17
74% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3LK2/8GX KHX1600C9D3LK2/4GX KHX1600C9D3LK2/8GX KHX1600C9D3LK2/4GX 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LE Builds (Compare 380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback