Asus P8Z77-V LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LE  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '16 at 21:31
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470T-$130
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 165
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 230
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Sapphire(174B E244) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 22.6
14% 18.7 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 18.7
14% 16.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$88
3TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 131
Write 143
Mixed 126
100% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.22
80% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 85%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
458GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 104
Mixed 97
74% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.59
4K Mixed 0.2
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
436GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 112
Write 97.9
Mixed 96.8
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.19
86% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 86%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
158GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 103
Write 106
Mixed 116
82% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.2
77% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
43GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 79.7
Write 116
Mixed 87.5
71% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.19
74% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3LK2/8GX KHX1600C9D3LK2/4GX KHX1600C9D3LK2/8GX KHX1600C9D3LK2/4GX 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LE Builds (Compare 379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback