Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2P-B3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S2P-B3  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '19 at 13:51
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 334
39% 303 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 39.1
Parallax 51.4
34% 44.2 fps
MRender 54.6
Gravity 49.5
Splatting 36.4
37% 46.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNS064GG2BBAA 64GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGNA0206
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 68 96 133 171 179 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 3% Great: 66%
Ccboot iSCSI 491GB
35GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 27 28 27 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 3% Great: 41%
Ccboot iSCSI 807GB
57GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 27 28 27 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 69
Write 53.5
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 26.5
37% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 7.1
1,200% 6.9 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 66.1
61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-S2P-B3 Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2P-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback