HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP EliteBook 8770w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176C
Memory	18.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180530
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '19 at 06:54
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	67.9% Good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 80.9 2-Core 166 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 390 45% 352 Pts	64-Core 416 26% 416 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro M4000 1,496 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 176C) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	8.31% Terrible	Lighting 9.77 Reflection 11.3 Parallax 12.4 8% 11.2 fps	MRender 9.29 Gravity 9.07 Splatting 13.5 9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.31% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 278 95 55 31 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 444 Write 288 Mixed 340 SusWrite 81 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 31.5 102% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 207 162% 219 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 124%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77 8,773 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 30GB free Firmware: JF4OA0E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 67 66 67 67 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 61.5 Write 64 Mixed 38 SusWrite 65.8 42% 57.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 68%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 355GB free Firmware: AX001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 50 Write 50.8 Mixed 26 SusWrite 53.6 33% 45.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 62%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 364GB free, PID 6388 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 101 100 101 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 94.2 Write 96.2 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 99.6 109% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 24GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.2% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 9.5 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 11.4 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 81.2 49% 81.2 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	100x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	93x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	82x

GPU
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	298x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	95x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	26x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	34x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $45Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	14x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	13x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	20x
EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x8GBElpidaBench 51%, 682 samples	12x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 53%, 361 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359