Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	11.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Intel powered classmate PC (all builds)
Memory	0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120504
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '19 at 05:19
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	URY-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N550 837 User benchmarks, average bench 21% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Memory 33.1 1-Core 4.5 2-Core 6.8 13% 14.8 Pts	4-Core 7.4 8-Core 9 1% 8.2 Pts	64-Core 10.2 1% 10.2 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 25%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 8GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10.02.08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 14 14 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 120 Write 15.8 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 14.4 9% 41.5 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 2.4 22% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 012345678901234567890123456789012345 1x1GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1 of 2 slots used 1GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	7.16% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 2.3 7% 2.6 GB/s	SC Read 0 SC Write 0 SC Mixed 0.3 0% 0.1 GB/s	Latency 237 17% 237 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.16% Great: 9%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 847Intel $259Bench 34%, 3,990 samples	28x
Celeron N2805IntelBench 26%, 291 samples	21x
Celeron N2808IntelBench 31%, 698 samples	17x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	52x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	29x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
U110 32GBSandiskBench 33%, 68 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	27x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	18x
M471B5674QH0-YK0 1x2GBSamsungBench 17%, 2,147 samples	10x

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $287

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16