Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160613
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 21 '19 at 15:25
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 83.9
1-Core 129
2-Core 256
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 620
71% 553 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0412) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Sapphire(174B E193) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.15
Parallax 5.72
5% 6.02 fps
MRender 4.48
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 4.83
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 128GB
112GB free
Firmware: HTRAN101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 394 385 394 417 416 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 421
Mixed 405
SusWrite 400
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 41.5
150% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 339
252% 333 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 103%
Great: 102%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 128GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTRAN101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 280 266 205 101 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 456
Write 419
Mixed 399
SusWrite 204
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 40.6
131% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 260
187% 247 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 123 122 121 125 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 120
Write 114
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 122
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
138GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 70 71 71 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 69.8
Write 68.8
Mixed 40
SusWrite 69.6
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 61%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
932GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 124 126 125 123 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 175
Write 160
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 121
87% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 107%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
324GB free, PID 0100
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 60
Write 61.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 61.3
71% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Vulcan 1600 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 0423 Vulcan 1600 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.3% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $619
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback