Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '19 at 05:46
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 972
86% 731 Pts
64-Core 1,319
82% 1,319 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gainward(10B0 1F07) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 122
Parallax 125
106% 126 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 125
Splatting 101
105% 133 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 945 664 665 662 646 649 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,524
Write 2,354
Mixed 1,640
SusWrite 705
403% 1,806 MB/s
4K Read 61.8
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 81
271% 93.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,019
DQ Write 819
DQ Mixed 947
701% 928 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 269%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
131GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 197 196 196 197 197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 375
Write 363
Mixed 352
SusWrite 197
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 52.4
171% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 224
165% 217 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 133%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 187 187 187 187 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 185
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 187
106% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
ST2000DL 004 HD204UI 2TB
451GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 44 46 47 45 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 54.3
Write 52.2
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 45.9
64% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 33.5
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 40.6
SC Mixed 28.8
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 665 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $789
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback