Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Memory 65.7 1-Core 52.3 2-Core 105 46% 74.4 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 339 34% 275 Pts	64-Core 785 49% 785 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 079C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Lighting 12.1 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 15.1 10% 12.8 fps	MRender 16.6 Gravity 14.7 Splatting 13.4 12% 14.9 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221 10,770 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 236 225 240 241 237 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 308 Write 235 Mixed 172 SusWrite 236 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 25.6 4K Mixed 10.2 48% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 65.5 79% 136 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 84%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 931GB free Firmware: AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 98 99 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 93.5 Write 99 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 99 65% 88 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 59%
WD Red Pro 2TB (2014)-$140 716 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2TB free Firmware: 0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 125 125 125 125 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 135 Write 122 Mixed 101 SusWrite 125 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YK0 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 36JSF1... 128GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.8% Good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 23.9 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 5.5 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	146x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16